DMARC via dmarc-discuss
2017-12-06 14:48:09 UTC
I've always been a little confused with the distinctions between
the 'iodef' Incident Object Description Exchange Format or 'afrf'
Authentication Failure Reporting Formats.
Obviously, afrf has become the defacto standard, as that's all I see in any
DMARC record that I examine.
I've reviewed https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5070 and am no closer to
appreciating the impact of selecting one format over another.
Is this an example where one standard as been publically accepted and the
competing standards are more or less deprecated in deployment ?
Thanks, Jack
the 'iodef' Incident Object Description Exchange Format or 'afrf'
Authentication Failure Reporting Formats.
Obviously, afrf has become the defacto standard, as that's all I see in any
DMARC record that I examine.
I've reviewed https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5070 and am no closer to
appreciating the impact of selecting one format over another.
Is this an example where one standard as been publically accepted and the
competing standards are more or less deprecated in deployment ?
Thanks, Jack